Comparison
OCRQueen vs AWS Textract
We match Textract on tables, beat them on PPTX charts and technical diagrams, and offer one simple per-page price instead of Textract's per-feature billing.
Pricing — side by side
| Scenario | AWS Textract | OCRQueen |
|---|---|---|
| 20-page patent (FORMS + TABLES + LAYOUT) | $1.50–$3.00 | $0.30 |
| PPTX | Not supported | $0.015 / slide |
Prices reflect each provider's published list pricing as of the page's last update. Volume discounts available on both sides.
Where AWS Textract wins
Honest acknowledgement — these are real strengths to weigh.
- Excellent OCR on scanned documents
- Strong table extraction (TABLES feature)
- Deeply integrated with the AWS ecosystem
Where OCRQueen wins
Specific, measurable differences — not marketing fluff.
- One predictable price per page — Textract bills per feature, easy to overrun budgets
- Native PPTX support — Textract doesn't accept PPTX
- Diagram graph extraction (Textract returns bounding boxes only)
- Math equations preserved as LaTeX
- JSON output ready for RAG with no Lambda gluing
Migrating from AWS Textract
Textract returns AnalyzeDocument blocks; our schema maps cleanly. PPTX customers can switch immediately — Textract has no PPTX support.